Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
9330
HE damage (avg/round)
13.73.4
USP damage (avg/round)
13.24.6
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
40801012
Shots (total/round)
9216
Player score (round)
37661012
Shots (total/round)
8316
Damage (total/round)
44473
Player score (round)
44351012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
57%
Dust II
50%
Train
50%
Mirage
34%
Inferno
30%
Vertigo
4%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
57%
7
1
Dust II
50%
4
1
Train
50%
6
4
Mirage
33%
6
2
Inferno
20%
5
5
Vertigo
71%
7
0
Overpass
0%
0
13
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
2
Dust II
0%
2
1
Train
0%
2
2
Mirage
67%
3
0
Inferno
50%
2
2
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Overpass
0%
0
5
Info
Match analysis of G2 vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between G2 and AGO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was huNter-.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were mhL contributed 63 kills and Furlan contributed 56 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 30682 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
G2 analytics
The team G2 managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for G2 were huNter- contributed 71 kills and nexa contributed 61 kills. 32323 of total damage by G2 could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, G2 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments