Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:25s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.316.3
Galil kills on a map
51.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
24.15.9
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:09s00:36s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5328
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.5022
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:10s00:36s
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
53%
Vertigo
40%
Inferno
39%
Anubis
35%
Ancient
17%
Dust II
8%
Mirage
2%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
2
21
Vertigo
33%
12
10
Inferno
39%
31
1
Anubis
32%
22
17
Ancient
50%
30
7
Dust II
52%
21
1
Mirage
50%
26
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
53%
19
3
Vertigo
73%
15
1
Inferno
0%
0
14
Anubis
67%
21
2
Ancient
67%
21
1
Dust II
44%
9
5
Mirage
52%
21
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of DMS vs Revenant by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DMS and Revenant, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Vertigo, and victory was secured by Revenant. The MVP of this match was reiko.
Revenant analytics
The team Revenant secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Revenant were reiko contributed 42 kills and Nivera contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16830 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Revenant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 31 kills and H1te contributed 28 kills. 14420 of total damage by DMS could not prevent Revenant from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments