Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.95.9
HE damage (avg/round)
11.43.4
Smoke thrown on a map
1714.5022
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.84.1
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4528
Smoke thrown on a map
2114.5022
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.45.9
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.42.1
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3014
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
18.83.6
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
26%
Inferno
21%
Anubis
12%
Mirage
11%
Ancient
1%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
52%
21
1
Inferno
36%
28
1
Anubis
26%
19
15
Mirage
48%
25
1
Ancient
52%
25
7
Vertigo
36%
11
8
Nuke
0%
2
17
Last 5 maps
Dust II
78%
9
11
Inferno
57%
30
4
Anubis
38%
26
15
Mirage
59%
56
0
Ancient
53%
36
3
Vertigo
36%
22
12
Nuke
0%
1
44
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of DMS vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between DMS and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by Endpoint. The MVP of this match was cej0t.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint secured 26 out of 41 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Endpoint were cej0t contributed 35 kills and AZUWU contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16242 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 15 out of 41 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 11 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were sm3t contributed 26 kills and AW contributed 23 kills. 13666 of total damage by DMS could not prevent Endpoint from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments