0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
123
Deagle damage (avg/round)
19.35.4
AK47 kills on a map
166.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
58.225.3
HE damage (avg/round)
133.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.22
Player score (round)
51181012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
60%
Nuke
54%
Mirage
50%
Ancient
46%
Vertigo
30%
Inferno
24%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
2
8
Nuke
13%
8
3
Mirage
0%
0
14
Ancient
71%
7
4
Vertigo
50%
2
1
Inferno
55%
11
0
Overpass
0%
0
7
Last 5 maps
Dust II
60%
5
2
Nuke
67%
3
8
Mirage
50%
8
1
Ancient
25%
4
4
Vertigo
20%
5
8
Inferno
31%
13
1
Overpass
0%
0
11
Info
Match analysis of FTW vs INFINITE by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FTW and INFINITE, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by FTW. The MVP of this match was ewjerkz.
FTW analytics
The team FTW secured 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FTW were ewjerkz contributed 27 kills and Ag1L contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10516 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FTW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
INFINITE analytics
The team INFINITE managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for INFINITE were zrkk contributed 19 kills and zewts contributed 18 kills. 7804 of total damage by INFINITE could not prevent FTW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, INFINITE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments