0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
133
M4A4 kills on a map
93.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
48.312.7
HE kills on a map
21.127
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.53.4
Smoke thrown on a map
1715.0371
AWP kills on a map
136.5798
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
48.216.7
AK47 damage (avg/round)
6425.3
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4830
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
53%
Overpass
50%
Nuke
44%
Inferno
35%
Ancient
31%
Mirage
7%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
4
21
Overpass
50%
12
3
Nuke
69%
13
11
Inferno
85%
13
6
Ancient
33%
6
22
Mirage
40%
15
6
Dust II
40%
5
18
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
53%
15
4
Overpass
100%
1
28
Nuke
25%
12
15
Inferno
50%
14
11
Ancient
64%
22
2
Mirage
33%
18
2
Dust II
43%
14
5
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and AGO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was FASHR.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 16 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were FASHR contributed 21 kills and nicoodoz contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8914 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
AGO analytics
The team AGO managed to secure 2 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for AGO were leman contributed 14 kills and jedqr contributed 13 kills. 5730 of total damage by AGO could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, AGO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments