Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AUG kills on a map
72.6098
HE kills on a map
21.127
Galil kills on a map
41.8064
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:13s00:39s
Player score (round)
40361012
Shots (total/round)
11816
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
HE damage (total/round)
9426.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:38s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
50%
Inferno
37%
Mirage
36%
Nuke
24%
Train
17%
Dust II
16%
Vertigo
7%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
50%
10
4
Inferno
67%
21
0
Mirage
36%
11
5
Nuke
43%
7
22
Train
50%
10
0
Dust II
40%
5
18
Vertigo
50%
10
9
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
2
8
Inferno
30%
10
3
Mirage
0%
1
10
Nuke
67%
9
5
Train
67%
3
3
Dust II
56%
9
3
Vertigo
43%
7
0
Info
Match analysis of fnatic vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between fnatic and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Overpass, Vertigo, and victory was secured by fnatic. The MVP of this match was JW.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for fnatic were JW contributed 62 kills and KRIMZ contributed 59 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 26362 overall damage.
On the defensive side, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were leo_drk contributed 52 kills and vsm contributed 43 kills. 23543 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent fnatic from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments