Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
53%
Anubis
46%
Ancient
20%
Dust II
10%
Vertigo
5%
Mirage
5%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
53%
32
17
Anubis
0%
0
65
Ancient
73%
33
14
Dust II
53%
17
29
Vertigo
55%
22
13
Mirage
55%
38
9
Inferno
56%
27
14
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
52
Anubis
46%
41
6
Ancient
53%
38
9
Dust II
43%
21
22
Vertigo
60%
15
9
Mirage
50%
32
14
Inferno
58%
31
11
Last results
Head to head
Info
Map Analysis of Fluxo vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team
Solid on Inferno Analysis
Solid demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Solid on Inferno were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Solid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Fluxo on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Fluxo, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Fluxo on Inferno included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Fluxo couldn't prevent Solid from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Fluxo struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments