0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:25s
AK47 kills on a map
106.5019
Galil kills on a map
31.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
19.85.9
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
16.74.1
Galil kills on a map
41.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
195.9
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
144.1
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3014
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
83%
Anubis
70%
Nuke
28%
Inferno
24%
Mirage
14%
Vertigo
1%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
83%
6
5
Anubis
0%
0
65
Nuke
63%
30
10
Inferno
60%
25
26
Mirage
53%
32
5
Vertigo
53%
19
32
Ancient
68%
25
8
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
21
Anubis
70%
37
0
Nuke
35%
34
24
Inferno
36%
25
25
Mirage
39%
31
32
Vertigo
52%
31
3
Ancient
68%
31
20
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Fluxo vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fluxo and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Fluxo. The MVP of this match was chay.
Fluxo analytics
The team Fluxo secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fluxo were chay contributed 19 kills and zevy contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7000 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fluxo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were Koala contributed 11 kills and pepe contributed 11 kills. 5255 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent Fluxo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments