0 Comments
197
205
65
-8
381
31:25
45
6
Nuke5.6
+10%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
43%
Overpass
38%
Ancient
24%
Mirage
12%
Nuke
10%
Inferno
3%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
43%
7
2
Overpass
63%
8
6
Ancient
62%
13
8
Mirage
29%
14
1
Nuke
43%
7
19
Inferno
30%
10
4
Anubis
0%
2
17
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
3
8
Overpass
25%
8
5
Ancient
38%
8
9
Mirage
17%
6
4
Nuke
33%
9
0
Inferno
33%
9
3
Anubis
0%
2
9
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwllw
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of FLUFFY AIMERS vs Take Flyte by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FLUFFY AIMERS and Take Flyte, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by FLUFFY AIMERS. The MVP of this match was CoJoMo.
FLUFFY AIMERS analytics
The team FLUFFY AIMERS secured 30 out of 56 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FLUFFY AIMERS were sacrifice contributed 53 kills and jason contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21817 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FLUFFY AIMERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Take Flyte analytics
The team Take Flyte managed to secure 26 out of 56 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Take Flyte were CoJoMo contributed 58 kills and chance contributed 39 kills. 21149 of total damage by Take Flyte could not prevent FLUFFY AIMERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Take Flyte struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments