Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Decoy grenades thrown
51.291
Smoke thrown on a map
2015.0371
Decoy grenades thrown
31.291
Openning kills on a map
7.352.9135
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
37981012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Knife kills
11
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
80%
Inferno
75%
Dust II
57%
Vertigo
40%
Mirage
32%
Overpass
12%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
80%
5
5
Inferno
100%
4
9
Dust II
71%
7
2
Vertigo
0%
1
15
Mirage
92%
13
0
Overpass
67%
6
3
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
17
Inferno
25%
12
1
Dust II
14%
7
2
Vertigo
40%
5
1
Mirage
60%
5
6
Overpass
55%
11
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Fiend vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Fiend and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Overpass, and victory was secured by Fiend. The MVP of this match was bubble.
Fiend analytics
The team Fiend secured 32 out of 46 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Overpass. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Fiend were bubble contributed 38 kills and v1c7oR contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18262 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Fiend held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint managed to secure 14 out of 46 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Endpoint were mezii contributed 32 kills and CRUC1AL contributed 28 kills. 15107 of total damage by Endpoint could not prevent Fiend from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments