Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:28s
Smoke thrown on a map
1715.0791
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.12
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:54s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
36961012
Damage (total/round)
38573
Player score (round)
34971012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
59%
Vertigo
22%
Ancient
18%
Nuke
15%
Inferno
6%
Anubis
3%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
59%
17
10
Vertigo
100%
1
34
Ancient
50%
10
12
Nuke
72%
18
5
Inferno
53%
17
4
Anubis
50%
10
14
Overpass
50%
14
5
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
48
Vertigo
78%
23
0
Ancient
68%
25
9
Nuke
57%
28
3
Inferno
59%
17
17
Anubis
53%
19
6
Overpass
50%
20
18
Info
Match analysis of FaZe vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FaZe and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by FaZe. The MVP of this match was Twistzz.
FaZe analytics
The team FaZe secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Anubis. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FaZe were Twistzz contributed 32 kills and broky contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15764 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FaZe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were ewjerkz contributed 25 kills and story contributed 22 kills. 12722 of total damage by SAW could not prevent FaZe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments