Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.64
Eco wins full buy
1
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
M4A4 kills on a map
123.4961
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
35.412.1
Molotov kills on a map
31.0811
Smoke thrown on a map
3214.6931
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
64%
Nuke
23%
Ancient
19%
Vertigo
17%
Mirage
15%
Anubis
3%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
64%
11
7
Nuke
70%
30
0
Ancient
61%
18
8
Vertigo
67%
6
36
Mirage
71%
14
9
Anubis
50%
10
16
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
44
Nuke
47%
17
11
Ancient
42%
19
9
Vertigo
50%
14
6
Mirage
56%
25
1
Anubis
47%
17
1
Info
Match analysis of FaZe vs Monte by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FaZe and Monte, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by FaZe. The MVP of this match was broky.
FaZe analytics
The team FaZe secured 40 out of 73 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Vertigo. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FaZe were broky contributed 72 kills and ropz contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 28898 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FaZe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 26 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Monte analytics
The team Monte managed to secure 33 out of 73 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Monte were DemQQ contributed 68 kills and Gizmy contributed 56 kills. 27311 of total damage by Monte could not prevent FaZe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Monte struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
2 Comments