Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Percentage of headshots
63%15%
Deagle kills on a map
31.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
21.95.4
M4A4 kills on a map
73.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
53.412.7
Smoke thrown on a map
1515.0371
M4A4 kills on a map
73.6448
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
39.612.7
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
USP kills on a map
31.616
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
71%
Inferno
40%
Ancient
40%
Overpass
16%
Dust II
5%
Nuke
3%
Mirage
3%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
31
Inferno
71%
17
5
Ancient
40%
10
4
Overpass
60%
10
17
Dust II
70%
10
13
Nuke
38%
8
17
Mirage
53%
17
4
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
71%
7
8
Inferno
31%
13
23
Ancient
0%
3
40
Overpass
44%
9
18
Dust II
65%
23
0
Nuke
35%
20
7
Mirage
50%
18
10
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of FaZe vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FaZe and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Dust II, Overpass, Nuke, and victory was secured by FaZe. The MVP of this match was syrsoN.
FaZe analytics
The team FaZe secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FaZe were broky contributed 47 kills and rain contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21593 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FaZe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were syrsoN contributed 46 kills and faveN contributed 42 kills. 21103 of total damage by BIG could not prevent FaZe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments