Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Galil damage (avg/round)
23.45.6
USP damage (avg/round)
14.84.6
USP kills on a map
51.616
USP damage (avg/round)
14.54.6
Shots (total/round)
10216
Shots (total/round)
9216
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
50%
Overpass
45%
Mirage
29%
Vertigo
26%
Dust II
24%
Inferno
18%
Nuke
7%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
17
Overpass
67%
9
28
Mirage
48%
23
5
Vertigo
74%
19
2
Dust II
74%
35
0
Inferno
36%
14
33
Nuke
40%
20
12
Last 5 maps
Ancient
50%
6
2
Overpass
22%
9
7
Mirage
77%
13
1
Vertigo
100%
1
23
Dust II
50%
8
6
Inferno
54%
13
4
Nuke
33%
9
10
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs FaZe by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and FaZe, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Inferno, and victory was secured by FaZe. The MVP of this match was broky.
FaZe analytics
The team FaZe secured 32 out of 48 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Inferno. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FaZe were broky contributed 38 kills and olofmeister contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18828 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FaZe held their ground firmly, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BIG analytics
The team BIG managed to secure 16 out of 48 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BIG were syrsoN contributed 25 kills and gade contributed 25 kills. 13967 of total damage by BIG could not prevent FaZe from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments