Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
67%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
50%
Anubis
21%
Inferno
10%
Ancient
5%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
67%
3
9
Vertigo
50%
2
10
Mirage
0%
0
14
Anubis
68%
19
0
Inferno
67%
9
2
Ancient
62%
13
1
Nuke
50%
12
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Anubis
89%
9
0
Inferno
57%
7
0
Ancient
57%
7
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- lwwww
Info
Match analysis of FAVBET vs ZEROvariant by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FAVBET and ZEROvariant, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by FAVBET. The MVP of this match was Smash.
FAVBET analytics
The team FAVBET secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FAVBET were Smash contributed 18 kills and j3kie contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8608 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ZEROvariant analytics
The team ZEROvariant managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ZEROvariant were h1KaNNN contributed 19 kills and woozzzi contributed 13 kills. 7718 of total damage by ZEROvariant could not prevent FAVBET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ZEROvariant struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments