Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
62%
Ancient
57%
Vertigo
50%
Nuke
50%
Dust II
45%
Inferno
T
3%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
62%
26
0
Ancient
57%
14
1
Vertigo
50%
2
15
Nuke
50%
14
0
Dust II
78%
9
9
Inferno
64%
11
2
Mirage
0%
0
19
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
33%
3
0
Inferno
67%
3
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- wllll
Info
Map Analysis of FAVBET vs The Spells by the Bo3.gg Team
FAVBET on Dust II Analysis
FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for FAVBET on Dust II were Smash, who contributed 20 kills, and max, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9360 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
The Spells on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for The Spells, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for The Spells on Dust II included AntyVirus, who contributed 17 kills, and fanatyk, who added 15 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7625 total damage, The Spells couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, The Spells struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments