Ended
1
Full stats

0 Comments

FAVBET Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

10

7

+16

137

4:0

9

1

9.9

+72%

13

14

11

-1

92

2:1

3

0

6.7

+5%

13

10

3

+3

71

3:1

1

0

6.5

+2%

11

9

3

+2

54

1:1

3

0

5.5

-5%

11

11

4

0

52

1:4

4

0

4.9

-12%

Total

74

54

28

+20

406

11:7

20

1

6.7

+12%

RUSH B Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

15

16

3

-1

84

2:2

2

1

6.7

-2%

9

12

4

-3

54

0:2

3

2

5.9

-15%

10

14

1

-4

68

3:1

2

0

5.5

-19%

8

17

6

-9

60

1:3

2

0

4.5

-27%

5

16

7

-11

48

0:2

1

0

4.2

-34%

Total

47

75

21

-28

314

6:10

10

3

5.3

-19%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of FAVBET vs RUSH B by the Bo3.gg Team

FAVBET on Inferno Analysis

FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno were bondik, who contributed 26 kills, and mAriX, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7708 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


RUSH B on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for RUSH B, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for RUSH B on Inferno included Z1Nny, who contributed 15 kills, and Kiro, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5961 total damage, RUSH B couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, RUSH B struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date