Ended
1
FAVBET
2 - 0
TNL
Full stats

0 Comments

FAVBET Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

12

9

+5

80

2:0

5

0

7.0

+16%

13

14

10

-1

97

5:2

3

0

6.8

+13%

14

13

7

+1

94

3:3

6

2

6.7

+12%

17

12

4

+5

78

1:2

4

0

6.6

+4%

14

12

6

+2

62

1:1

3

0

6.0

-1%

Total

75

63

36

+12

411

12:8

21

2

6.6

+9%

TNL Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

15

3

+1

92

4:2

6

0

6.7

+9%

13

17

4

-4

85

2:2

3

1

6.1

-4%

14

15

5

-1

71

0:1

2

1

5.8

+5%

12

16

2

-4

68

2:1

2

0

5.4

-6%

6

15

2

-9

44

0:6

1

0

3.5

-26%

Total

61

78

16

-17

359

8:12

14

2

5.5

-5%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of FAVBET vs TNL by the Bo3.gg Team

FAVBET on Inferno Analysis

FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno were bondik, who contributed 17 kills, and mAriX, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8220 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


TNL on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for TNL, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for TNL on Inferno included St0m4k, who contributed 16 kills, and Ganginho, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7189 total damage, TNL couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, TNL struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date