0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:18s01:55s
Player score (round)
37241010
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
44241010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
70%
Inferno
25%
Anubis
15%
Dust II
14%
Ancient
4%
Mirage
3%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
30%
30
11
Inferno
73%
41
3
Anubis
65%
52
3
Dust II
60%
25
16
Ancient
63%
43
7
Mirage
50%
2
52
Vertigo
50%
18
32
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
12
Inferno
48%
21
4
Anubis
50%
34
2
Dust II
74%
23
2
Ancient
67%
46
0
Mirage
53%
19
4
Vertigo
50%
12
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of FAVBET vs L&G by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between FAVBET and L&G, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by FAVBET. The MVP of this match was kL1okL1o.
FAVBET analytics
The team FAVBET secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for FAVBET were t3ns1on contributed 17 kills and Smash contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9676 overall damage.
On the defensive side, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
L&G analytics
The team L&G managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for L&G were kL1okL1o contributed 26 kills and Malkiss contributed 18 kills. 8364 of total damage by L&G could not prevent FAVBET from securing the victory
On the defensive side, L&G struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments