Ended
1
Basic stats

0 Comments

FAVBET Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

7

5

+17

154

0:3

10

0

9.6

+88%

12

10

4

+2

84

3:2

3

0

6.6

+9%

10

5

1

+5

60

0:0

2

0

5.9

+3%

7

10

6

-3

67

1:3

1

1

5.5

+4%

8

6

0

+2

46

3:1

2

0

5.5

-4%

Total

61

38

16

+23

412

7:9

18

1

6.6

+20%

GenOne Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

11

0

+3

86

1:1

2

0

6.9

+5%

9

12

1

-3

65

2:0

1

0

6.0

-9%

7

12

4

-5

52

3:1

0

0

5.6

-27%

5

15

2

-10

53

3:3

1

0

4.5

-33%

3

11

2

-8

34

0:2

1

0

3.8

-43%

Total

38

61

9

-23

290

9:7

5

0

5.4

-21%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of FAVBET vs GenOne by the Bo3.gg Team

FAVBET on Inferno Analysis

FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno were Smash, who contributed 24 kills, and mAriX, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6595 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


GenOne on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for GenOne, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for GenOne on Inferno included Kursy, who contributed 14 kills, and Brooxsy, who added 9 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4637 total damage, GenOne couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, GenOne struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date