Ended
FAMBIT
2 - 0
EKO
Full stats

0 Comments

FAMBIT Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

28

12

2

+16

124

2:2

10

1

8.5

+47%

23

14

6

+9

119

3:2

7

0

8.0

+50%

19

17

2

+2

82

4:2

6

0

6.6

+10%

14

8

6

+6

68

2:2

4

1

6.2

+7%

9

9

1

0

44

2:1

0

0

5.0

-12%

Total

93

60

17

+33

437

13:9

27

2

6.9

+20%

EKO Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

17

2

-1

89

1:2

4

1

6.6

+13%

13

18

0

-5

63

4:3

3

0

5.7

-28%

12

20

3

-8

74

3:5

2

0

5.5

-17%

14

19

1

-5

57

1:1

4

0

5.4

+5%

5

19

2

-14

31

0:2

1

0

3.8

-43%

Total

60

93

8

-33

314

9:13

14

1

5.4

-14%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of FAMBIT vs EKO by the Bo3.gg Team

FAMBIT on Inferno Analysis

FAMBIT demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAMBIT on Inferno were volt, who contributed 28 kills, and Ping, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9613 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAMBIT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


EKO on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for EKO, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for EKO on Inferno included cryths, who contributed 16 kills, and Jamie, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6901 total damage, EKO couldn't prevent FAMBIT from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, EKO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date