0 Comments
212
212
58
0
368
38:24
47
1
Anubis6.1
+2%
Teams advantage
Score
6.2
6.3
Mirage-0.1
Win Rounds
27
35
Mirage2
Kills
212
212
Mirage-2
Damage
22.89K
23.52K
Mirage103
Economy
1.44M
1.44M
Mirage-12300
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:27s
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.8354
AK47 damage (avg/round)
59.325.3
USP kills on a map
41.6107
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
14.13.9
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.75.7
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Stand-in
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
40%
Ancient
29%
Anubis
10%
Overpass
e
7%
Inferno
3%
Vertigo
3%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
33%
3
4
Ancient
29%
7
3
Anubis
40%
5
2
Overpass
71%
7
1
Inferno
60%
5
3
Vertigo
50%
2
5
Nuke
0%
0
11
Last 5 maps
Mirage
73%
22
6
Ancient
58%
31
5
Anubis
50%
16
18
Overpass
64%
11
9
Inferno
63%
24
10
Vertigo
53%
17
8
Nuke
0%
0
40
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllll
- wwwww
Info
Match analysis of ex-ENEIDA vs Endpoint by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ex-ENEIDA and Endpoint, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by Endpoint. The MVP of this match was sl3nd.
Endpoint analytics
The team Endpoint secured 35 out of 62 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 11 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Endpoint were sl3nd contributed 56 kills and Surreal contributed 47 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23522 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Endpoint held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ex-ENEIDA analytics
The team ex-ENEIDA managed to secure 27 out of 62 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ex-ENEIDA were Polbandana contributed 48 kills and kensizor contributed 51 kills. 22894 of total damage by ex-ENEIDA could not prevent Endpoint from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ex-ENEIDA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments