Endpoint Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

18

2

+4

86

4:2

5

0

6.7

+9%

20

16

4

+4

87

2:2

5

0

6.4

+3%

19

18

3

+1

72

2:4

3

0

5.8

-7%

13

20

5

-7

54

2:1

2

0

5.1

-11%

11

20

1

-9

42

2:7

3

0

4.3

-28%

Total

85

92

15

-7

342

12:16

18

0

5.6

-7%

SAW Scoreboard Nuke (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

27

19

3

+8

106

4:3

7

0

7.7

+26%

19

18

2

+1

74

6:3

3

0

6.1

0%

19

18

3

+1

70

3:4

4

0

5.6

-5%

12

13

3

-1

52

2:1

1

1

5.4

-11%

14

18

3

-4

56

1:1

2

0

5.3

-15%

Total

91

86

14

+5

357

16:12

17

1

6.0

-1%

Teams advantage Nuke (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Endpoint vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Nuke Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Nuke were rmn, who contributed 27 kills, and MUTiRiS, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 9998 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Nuke, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Endpoint on Nuke Analysis

Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Endpoint, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Endpoint on Nuke included HeavyGod, who contributed 22 kills, and mhL, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9564 total damage, Endpoint couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Nuke


On the defensive side of Nuke, Endpoint struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date