Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38811012
Damage (total/round)
38573
Multikill x-
4
Knife kills
11
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
Defuse at the last second
03:11s
Smoke thrown on a map
2215.0371
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5830
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
68%
Dust II
22%
Overpass
12%
Ancient
10%
Mirage
8%
Vertigo
6%
Inferno
4%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
68%
22
10
Dust II
70%
30
3
Overpass
67%
18
16
Ancient
63%
8
15
Mirage
40%
5
47
Vertigo
63%
16
21
Inferno
63%
19
22
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
51
Dust II
48%
25
1
Overpass
55%
20
14
Ancient
53%
15
25
Mirage
48%
21
11
Vertigo
57%
21
6
Inferno
59%
32
3
Info
Match analysis of MIBR vs EC Kyiv by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between MIBR and EC Kyiv, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Dust II, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was JOTA.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 30 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Dust II. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were JOTA contributed 38 kills and Tuurtle contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18776 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
EC Kyiv analytics
The team EC Kyiv managed to secure 21 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for EC Kyiv were Kvem contributed 39 kills and byr9 contributed 31 kills. 16690 of total damage by EC Kyiv could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, EC Kyiv struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments