Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
123
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:24s01:30s
USP damage (avg/round)
13.64.6
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.13.8
AK47 kills on a map
146.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
92.125.3
Damage (avg/round)
133.11939.7
Shots (total/round)
11016
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35161012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
40%
Inferno
33%
Overpass
15%
Vertigo
13%
Dust II
7%
Mirage
7%
Ancient
3%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
60
Inferno
64%
59
2
Overpass
43%
30
19
Vertigo
40%
20
25
Dust II
57%
35
7
Mirage
57%
54
3
Ancient
59%
29
13
Last 5 maps
Nuke
40%
25
1
Inferno
31%
35
8
Overpass
58%
19
10
Vertigo
53%
15
8
Dust II
50%
6
27
Mirage
64%
45
4
Ancient
56%
16
14
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs eSuba by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and eSuba, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 3-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Overpass, Inferno, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was nbqq.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were nbqq contributed 55 kills and Dytor contributed 46 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25462 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eSuba were M1key contributed 48 kills and Pechyn contributed 47 kills. 22930 of total damage by eSuba could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments