0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
14.34.6
AK47 damage (avg/round)
57.925.3
AK47 damage (avg/round)
59.525.3
Shots (total/round)
9216
Player score (round)
35371012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
9026.8
HE damage (total/round)
10526.8
Rounds win streak
113
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
43%
Inferno
32%
Dust II
17%
Vertigo
10%
Ancient
8%
Overpass
7%
Mirage
1%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
43%
21
0
Inferno
29%
24
7
Dust II
50%
6
12
Vertigo
54%
13
2
Ancient
53%
15
8
Overpass
50%
4
14
Mirage
62%
34
2
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
50
Inferno
61%
49
1
Dust II
67%
30
9
Vertigo
44%
18
20
Ancient
45%
22
11
Overpass
43%
30
15
Mirage
63%
57
2
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of eSuba vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between eSuba and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Mirage, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was Dytor.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were Dytor contributed 39 kills and K1-FiDa contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18573 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
eSuba analytics
The team eSuba managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for eSuba were Blogg1s contributed 31 kills and M1key contributed 32 kills. 16355 of total damage by eSuba could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, eSuba struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments