Ended
Basic stats

0 Comments

ECLOT Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

20

15

6

+5

101

3:3

4

1

7.6

+19%

17

15

4

+2

68

4:2

4

1

6.4

-3%

14

14

10

0

75

3:2

5

0

6.3

+2%

13

17

5

-4

57

2:1

3

0

5.2

-13%

9

15

6

-6

62

0:2

0

0

4.7

-18%

Total

73

76

31

-3

362

12:10

16

2

6.0

-3%

CEPTER Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

14

6

+5

92

5:2

4

1

7.2

+15%

19

16

6

+3

93

3:1

3

0

7.1

+61%

17

15

4

+2

73

1:4

5

0

5.8

+34%

12

12

2

0

62

0:3

4

0

5.1

-7%

9

16

7

-7

44

1:2

2

1

4.8

-6%

Total

76

73

25

+3

364

10:12

18

2

6.0

+20%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of ECLOT vs CEPTER by the Bo3.gg Team

CEPTER on Anubis Analysis

CEPTER demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CEPTER on Anubis were LUMSEN, who contributed 19 kills, and brzer, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8011 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, CEPTER held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


ECLOT on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for ECLOT, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for ECLOT on Anubis included nbqq, who contributed 20 kills, and Blytz, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7965 total damage, ECLOT couldn't prevent CEPTER from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date