Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6074
Speed Round (sec)
00:26s01:55s
Player score (round)
45771011
Damage (total/round)
40473
Player score (round)
35501011
Damage (total/round)
46173
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
63%
Overpass
54%
Vertigo
50%
Mirage
39%
Nuke
25%
Ancient
24%
Anubis
9%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
63%
19
4
Overpass
54%
28
3
Vertigo
50%
6
23
Mirage
41%
22
12
Nuke
58%
24
20
Ancient
44%
27
12
Anubis
59%
29
11
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
4
1
Vertigo
0%
5
1
Mirage
80%
5
0
Nuke
33%
3
0
Ancient
20%
5
1
Anubis
50%
6
0
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of ECLOT vs CEPTER by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ECLOT and CEPTER, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by CEPTER. The MVP of this match was LUMSEN.
CEPTER analytics
The team CEPTER secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CEPTER were LUMSEN contributed 36 kills and brzer contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15974 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CEPTER held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ECLOT were FORSYY contributed 30 kills and nbqq contributed 28 kills. 15077 of total damage by ECLOT could not prevent CEPTER from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ECLOT struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments