Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:25s
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.5022
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.5022
Player score (round)
43511010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:25s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
47.316.3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
40%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
23%
Vertigo
12%
Inferno
9%
Dust II
7%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
70%
47
2
Nuke
33%
6
17
Mirage
69%
16
2
Vertigo
43%
23
4
Inferno
50%
10
17
Dust II
45%
11
12
Ancient
42%
26
1
Last 5 maps
Anubis
30%
23
16
Nuke
0%
2
22
Mirage
46%
26
1
Vertigo
31%
13
9
Inferno
41%
32
0
Dust II
52%
21
2
Ancient
47%
32
7
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwlw
- llllw
Info
Match analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between CYBERSHOKE and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by CYBERSHOKE. The MVP of this match was FenomeN.
CYBERSHOKE analytics
The team CYBERSHOKE secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for CYBERSHOKE were FenomeN contributed 36 kills and lov1kus contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18825 overall damage.
On the defensive side, CYBERSHOKE held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 37 kills and molodoy contributed 31 kills. 16591 of total damage by DMS could not prevent CYBERSHOKE from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments