CYBERSHOKE Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

18

7

-1

72

7:2

4

0

6.5

-10%

20

19

5

+1

81

2:2

4

0

6.1

-4%

22

24

2

-2

83

2:5

4

0

5.9

+11%

17

18

4

-1

69

2:1

2

1

5.8

-8%

11

23

3

-12

49

3:2

2

0

4.8

-40%

Total

87

102

21

-15

354

16:12

16

1

5.8

-10%

FAVBET Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

17

5

+7

90

6:4

6

0

7.2

+25%

23

16

7

+7

84

0:2

5

1

6.5

+20%

22

18

8

+4

90

2:5

5

0

6.4

+14%

17

21

5

-4

67

4:2

4

0

5.8

-18%

16

18

7

-2

55

0:3

5

1

5.2

-12%

Total

102

90

32

+12

386

12:16

25

2

6.2

+6%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of CYBERSHOKE vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team

FAVBET on Anubis Analysis

FAVBET demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for FAVBET on Anubis were t3ns1on, who contributed 24 kills, and bondik, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 10809 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, FAVBET held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


CYBERSHOKE on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for CYBERSHOKE, as they managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for CYBERSHOKE on Anubis included FenomeN, who contributed 17 kills, and lov1kus, who added 20 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 9921 total damage, CYBERSHOKE couldn't prevent FAVBET from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, CYBERSHOKE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date