0 Comments
89
110
23
-21
333
16:14
26
3
-12%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Records Vertigo
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
8816
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
13823.8
HE damage (total/round)
11826.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:30s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:20s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Info
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs Apeks by the Bo3.gg Team
Apeks on Vertigo Analysis
Apeks demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Apeks on Vertigo were STYKO, who contributed 27 kills, and jL, who added 28 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 11551 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for Copenhagen Flames, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Vertigo included b0RUP, who contributed 23 kills, and raalz, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10001 total damage, Copenhagen Flames couldn't prevent Apeks from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments