FAVBET Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

15

4

+1

88

1:2

4

1

7.1

+10%

13

15

1

-2

77

1:1

3

0

6.1

-3%

10

17

5

-7

79

2:3

3

0

5.7

-17%

2

14

10

-12

36

0:1

0

0

4.0

-53%

4

16

2

-12

25

0:6

1

0

2.8

-58%

Total

45

77

22

-32

305

4:13

11

1

5.1

-24%

CPH Wolves Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

20

11

11

+9

126

5:1

6

0

8.9

+48%

23

5

4

+18

108

3:0

8

0

8.8

+63%

17

11

3

+6

99

3:1

6

0

7.6

+27%

10

9

9

+1

64

1:2

2

1

6.0

+3%

7

9

3

-2

55

1:0

0

0

5.4

-15%

Total

77

45

30

+32

454

13:4

22

1

7.3

+25%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of FAVBET vs CPH Wolves by the Bo3.gg Team

CPH Wolves on Inferno Analysis

CPH Wolves demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for CPH Wolves on Inferno were aNdu, who contributed 20 kills, and eraa, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7710 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, CPH Wolves held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


FAVBET on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for FAVBET, as they managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for FAVBET on Inferno included Smash, who contributed 16 kills, and bondik, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5186 total damage, FAVBET couldn't prevent CPH Wolves from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, FAVBET struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date