0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Nuke
50%
Inferno
26%
Dust II
25%
Ancient
18%
Mirage
11%
Vertigo
2%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
67%
33
4
Nuke
63%
40
20
Inferno
47%
30
48
Dust II
0%
2
87
Ancient
71%
38
5
Mirage
52%
33
33
Vertigo
61%
33
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
2
27
Nuke
13%
8
18
Inferno
73%
11
1
Dust II
25%
8
11
Ancient
53%
15
2
Mirage
63%
24
1
Vertigo
63%
8
6
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwllw
- wlwlw
Info
Match analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs BLUEJAYS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Copenhagen Flames and BLUEJAYS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Mirage, Vertigo, and victory was secured by BLUEJAYS. The MVP of this match was Necrogenes1s.
BLUEJAYS analytics
The team BLUEJAYS secured 54 out of 104 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Vertigo. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BLUEJAYS were Necrogenes1s contributed 10 kills and dan1 contributed 89 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 39777 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BLUEJAYS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 32 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Copenhagen Flames analytics
The team Copenhagen Flames managed to secure 50 out of 104 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames were nicoodoz contributed 99 kills and roeJ contributed 86 kills. 39087 of total damage by Copenhagen Flames could not prevent BLUEJAYS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Copenhagen Flames struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 29 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments