0 Comments
84
56
25
+28
394
14:8
16
2
Inferno6.9
+20%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
33%
Ancient
33%
Inferno
19%
Mirage
14%
Nuke
6%
Dust II
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
83%
6
8
Ancient
33%
6
0
Inferno
50%
14
0
Mirage
50%
2
5
Nuke
50%
16
1
Dust II
63%
8
7
Vertigo
0%
1
4
Last 5 maps
Overpass
50%
2
4
Ancient
0%
0
3
Inferno
31%
13
0
Mirage
36%
14
1
Nuke
56%
9
2
Dust II
63%
8
0
Vertigo
0%
3
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllwl
- lllww
Info
Match analysis of Conquer vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Conquer and Zero Tenacity, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Zero Tenacity. The MVP of this match was Cjoffo.
Zero Tenacity analytics
The team Zero Tenacity secured 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Zero Tenacity were Cjoffo contributed 21 kills and nEMANHA contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8660 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Zero Tenacity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Conquer analytics
The team Conquer managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Conquer were LYNXi contributed 16 kills and eDi contributed 10 kills. 6769 of total damage by Conquer could not prevent Zero Tenacity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Conquer struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments