0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6
6.3
Nuke0.3
Win Rounds
12
16
Nuke4
Kills
91
100
Nuke9
Damage
9.98K
10.72K
Nuke746
Economy
560.4K
581.25K
Nuke20850
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
f
67%
Inferno
36%
Dust II
f
33%
Overpass
33%
Nuke
f
12%
Mirage
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
33%
3
3
Inferno
36%
14
0
Dust II
67%
6
2
Overpass
33%
3
4
Nuke
38%
16
0
Mirage
0%
1
5
Ancient
50%
10
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
1
2
Inferno
0%
0
2
Dust II
100%
2
0
Overpass
0%
2
0
Nuke
50%
4
0
Mirage
0%
1
1
Ancient
50%
2
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllwl
- llwlw
Info
Match analysis of Conquer vs flowstate by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Conquer and flowstate, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by flowstate. The MVP of this match was Jelo.
flowstate analytics
The team flowstate secured 28 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for flowstate were Kaide contributed 25 kills and Bels contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10722 overall damage.
On the defensive side, flowstate held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Conquer analytics
The team Conquer managed to secure 0 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Conquer were Jelo contributed 27 kills and eDi contributed 21 kills. 9976 of total damage by Conquer could not prevent flowstate from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Conquer struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments