0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:22s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
0-15:0-55s01:27s
Molotov kills on a map
11.0818
Molotov damage (avg/round)
12.52
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.53.9
USP damage (avg/round)
18.14.7
M4A1 kills on a map
44.5517
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4429
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
17.53.9
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Ancient
75%
Dust II
42%
Mirage
35%
Vertigo
33%
Inferno
13%
Nuke
11%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
6
6
Ancient
25%
4
7
Dust II
25%
4
17
Mirage
40%
10
2
Vertigo
50%
2
8
Inferno
54%
13
4
Nuke
33%
3
17
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
25
Ancient
100%
4
6
Dust II
67%
12
6
Mirage
75%
12
3
Vertigo
83%
6
3
Inferno
67%
9
13
Nuke
44%
9
13
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Case vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Case and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was honda.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 7 out of 8 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were chay contributed 7 kills and n1ssim contributed 5 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 2499 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Case analytics
The team Case managed to secure 1 out of 8 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Case were honda contributed 8 kills and yepz contributed 6 kills. 2483 of total damage by Case could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Case struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments