Case Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

3

3

+19

142

3:0

6

1

10.0

+102%

17

8

3

+9

109

3:0

5

0

8.7

+68%

10

7

4

+3

82

3:1

3

0

7.0

+11%

11

7

1

+4

75

2:1

2

0

6.6

+17%

6

9

7

-3

48

0:2

1

0

4.9

-24%

Total

66

34

18

+32

455

11:4

17

1

7.4

+35%

Hawks Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

13

3

-3

81

1:1

2

1

6.1

0%

6

14

4

-8

51

2:2

0

0

4.7

0%

7

14

2

-7

60

1:4

0

0

4.2

-14%

4

13

1

-9

26

0:3

0

0

3.4

-41%

Total

27

54

10

-27

219

4:10

2

1

4.6

-28%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Case vs Hawks by the Bo3.gg Team

Case on Inferno Analysis

Case demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Case on Inferno were nyezin, who contributed 22 kills, and RICIOLI, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 6829 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Hawks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Hawks, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Hawks on Inferno included guidimonster, who contributed 10 kills, and kunzaga, who added 6 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3280 total damage, Hawks couldn't prevent Case from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Hawks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date