0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
34721012
Player score (round)
38661012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
39591012
Player score (round)
35361012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
63%
Ancient
48%
Inferno
23%
Dust II
11%
Vertigo
7%
Mirage
6%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
13
Ancient
63%
8
0
Inferno
40%
5
1
Dust II
20%
5
8
Vertigo
60%
5
2
Mirage
53%
15
1
Overpass
0%
1
17
Last 5 maps
Nuke
63%
19
2
Ancient
15%
13
8
Inferno
17%
12
13
Dust II
31%
13
9
Vertigo
53%
19
1
Mirage
59%
27
1
Overpass
0%
0
30
Info
Match analysis of BLUEJAYS vs EC Brugge by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BLUEJAYS and EC Brugge, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Vertigo, Mirage, and victory was secured by EC Brugge. The MVP of this match was kyxsan.
EC Brugge analytics
The team EC Brugge secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for EC Brugge were ritchiEE contributed 64 kills and kory contributed 54 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29882 overall damage.
On the defensive side, EC Brugge held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BLUEJAYS analytics
The team BLUEJAYS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BLUEJAYS were kyxsan contributed 65 kills and dan1 contributed 47 kills. 28483 of total damage by BLUEJAYS could not prevent EC Brugge from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BLUEJAYS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments