0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
156.732
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.42
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
8616
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Molotov damage (total/round)
9623.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
27%
Dust II
22%
Mirage
20%
Nuke
19%
Ancient
10%
Vertigo
7%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
70%
20
1
Dust II
46%
13
12
Mirage
70%
33
1
Nuke
22%
9
29
Ancient
43%
14
19
Vertigo
50%
10
8
Overpass
44%
9
21
Last 5 maps
Inferno
43%
7
31
Dust II
68%
22
0
Mirage
50%
16
11
Nuke
41%
17
7
Ancient
33%
9
27
Vertigo
57%
7
10
Overpass
44%
9
15
Info
Match analysis of BLUEJAYS vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BLUEJAYS and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was tabseN.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were tabseN contributed 20 kills and Krimbo contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9722 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BLUEJAYS analytics
The team BLUEJAYS managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BLUEJAYS were kyxsan contributed 14 kills and CacaNito contributed 16 kills. 8033 of total damage by BLUEJAYS could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BLUEJAYS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments