0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
21.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
54.24.8
M4A1 kills on a map
34.4189
Galil kills on a map
21.8164
Galil damage (avg/round)
31.45.9
GLOCK kills on a map
11.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
16.84.1
Percentage of headshots
73%15%
AK47 kills on a map
46.5019
AK47 damage (avg/round)
79.225.2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
60%
Anubis
26%
Vertigo
23%
Nuke
18%
Mirage
8%
Ancient
6%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
31
Anubis
69%
45
4
Vertigo
77%
13
21
Nuke
58%
12
43
Mirage
56%
32
11
Ancient
48%
42
11
Inferno
58%
31
4
Last 5 maps
Dust II
60%
30
0
Anubis
43%
23
25
Vertigo
100%
2
57
Nuke
40%
35
2
Mirage
48%
33
16
Ancient
54%
35
21
Inferno
56%
43
7
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BLEED vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BLEED and SINNERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by BLEED. The MVP of this match was oskar.
BLEED analytics
The team BLEED secured 1 out of 5 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BLEED were nawwk contributed 5 kills and nexa contributed 4 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 1929 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BLEED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS managed to secure 4 out of 5 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SINNERS were oskar contributed 9 kills and SHOCK contributed 3 kills. 2199 of total damage by SINNERS could not prevent BLEED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments