Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:26s
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.72
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.92
Player score (round)
36071011
Player score (round)
34881011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
70%
Vertigo
58%
Nuke
53%
Overpass
52%
Anubis
14%
Mirage
8%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
70%
20
0
Vertigo
83%
6
17
Nuke
100%
3
21
Overpass
100%
6
21
Anubis
69%
16
6
Mirage
62%
13
4
Ancient
50%
18
6
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
3
43
Vertigo
25%
20
11
Nuke
47%
17
22
Overpass
48%
21
9
Anubis
55%
29
7
Mirage
70%
20
11
Ancient
55%
31
8
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BLEED vs Sangal by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BLEED and Sangal, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Overpass, and victory was secured by BLEED. The MVP of this match was hampus.
BLEED analytics
The team BLEED secured 26 out of 45 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Overpass. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BLEED were hampus contributed 36 kills and CeRq contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17551 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BLEED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sangal analytics
The team Sangal managed to secure 19 out of 45 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 12 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sangal were jottAAA contributed 40 kills and LNZ contributed 21 kills. 13702 of total damage by Sangal could not prevent BLEED from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sangal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments