Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
113.8
USP kills on a map
41.616
USP damage (avg/round)
184.6
M4A1 kills on a map
134.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
54.316.7
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:23s00:39s
Damage (total/round)
45873
Player score (round)
42371012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
50%
Mirage
32%
Overpass
17%
Vertigo
17%
Ancient
12%
Nuke
5%
Dust II
4%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
41
Mirage
57%
14
12
Overpass
50%
10
21
Vertigo
50%
10
6
Ancient
38%
13
14
Nuke
63%
16
8
Dust II
72%
18
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
50%
20
23
Mirage
25%
4
49
Overpass
67%
15
13
Vertigo
67%
12
19
Ancient
50%
12
12
Nuke
68%
22
9
Dust II
68%
25
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was faveN.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 16 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were faveN contributed 24 kills and Krimbo contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9366 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 7 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were chelo contributed 18 kills and Tuurtle contributed 15 kills. 7006 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments