Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
114.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
58.916.7
Galil damage (avg/round)
18.65.6
USP damage (avg/round)
15.64.6
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.13.8
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:18s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5630
Player score (round)
39891012
Player score (round)
44421012
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
50%
Inferno
41%
Nuke
20%
Overpass
18%
Dust II
12%
Vertigo
11%
Ancient
8%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
50%
16
11
Inferno
100%
2
39
Nuke
50%
16
8
Overpass
44%
9
22
Dust II
76%
17
0
Vertigo
56%
9
5
Ancient
42%
12
17
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
1
46
Inferno
59%
17
22
Nuke
70%
20
8
Overpass
62%
13
13
Dust II
64%
22
2
Vertigo
67%
12
12
Ancient
50%
10
10
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was tabseN.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 38 out of 60 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were tabseN contributed 53 kills and faveN contributed 52 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 24095 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 22 out of 60 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were chelo contributed 47 kills and JOTA contributed 37 kills. 20505 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments