Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:30s
AUG kills on a map
82.6098
AUG damage (avg/round)
29.18.1
M4A1 kills on a map
114.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
49.716.7
Smoke thrown on a map
3315.0371
HE damage (avg/round)
13.33.4
Player score (round)
41131012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
64%
Anubis
40%
Nuke
36%
Mirage
29%
Inferno
27%
Overpass
26%
Vertigo
4%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
36
Anubis
100%
1
0
Nuke
36%
11
7
Mirage
50%
14
3
Inferno
40%
10
17
Overpass
20%
5
21
Vertigo
44%
9
5
Dust II
53%
15
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
64%
11
6
Anubis
60%
5
0
Nuke
0%
2
27
Mirage
79%
14
6
Inferno
67%
18
9
Overpass
46%
13
13
Vertigo
40%
10
13
Dust II
50%
6
3
Info
Match analysis of BIG vs Liquid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between BIG and Liquid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was k1to.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were k1to contributed 36 kills and Krimbo contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17983 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Liquid analytics
The team Liquid managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Liquid were NAF contributed 31 kills and nitr0 contributed 25 kills. 13905 of total damage by Liquid could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Liquid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments