Ended
BIG
0 - 2
G2
Full stats

0 Comments

BIG Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

26

26

16

0

91

6:5

6

0

6.6

+4%

27

21

5

+6

72

1:2

8

0

6.3

-2%

24

24

9

0

65

2:2

6

1

6.0

-9%

21

24

11

-3

65

1:2

6

0

5.6

-4%

23

28

14

-5

76

5:9

5

0

5.5

-3%

Total

121

123

55

-2

369

15:20

31

1

6.0

-3%

G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

24

27

13

-3

83

6:2

7

1

6.9

-6%

25

20

10

+5

77

2:3

6

2

6.6

+13%

27

25

6

+2

75

1:1

6

1

6.4

+5%

25

22

7

+3

73

5:3

8

1

6.4

-9%

22

28

10

-6

70

6:6

6

0

5.8

+5%

Total

123

122

46

+1

378

20:15

33

5

6.4

+1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of BIG vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were NiKo, who contributed 24 kills, and nexa, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 13246 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


BIG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for BIG, as they managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for BIG on Inferno included tabseN, who contributed 26 kills, and Krimbo, who added 27 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12905 total damage, BIG couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, BIG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date