Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
13.63.4
HE damage (avg/round)
17.73.4
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3011
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.43.6
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
124.2
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4516
Openning kills on a map
8.972.804
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
63%
Vertigo
43%
Ancient
20%
Nuke
10%
Inferno
9%
Anubis
5%
Dust II
3%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
63%
62
4
Vertigo
100%
5
62
Ancient
70%
50
6
Nuke
64%
39
5
Inferno
65%
23
19
Anubis
53%
30
13
Dust II
50%
16
41
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
38
Vertigo
57%
14
4
Ancient
50%
22
15
Nuke
74%
35
0
Inferno
56%
18
8
Anubis
48%
21
13
Dust II
53%
15
9
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of B8 vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between B8 and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was rmn.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were rmn contributed 18 kills and Ag1L contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8546 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
B8 analytics
The team B8 managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for B8 were headtr1ck contributed 19 kills and esenthial contributed 19 kills. 8681 of total damage by B8 could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, B8 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments