0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP damage (avg/round)
69.721.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.92
Speed Round (sec)
00:35s01:54s
Damage (total/round)
40973
Player score (round)
34801012
Player score (round)
35511012
Shots (total/round)
11616
Damage (total/round)
39173
Player score (round)
34641012
Damage (total/round)
38373
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
75%
Vertigo
73%
Dust II
44%
Overpass
34%
Mirage
20%
Ancient
17%
Inferno
11%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
25%
4
6
Vertigo
100%
6
3
Dust II
80%
10
3
Overpass
33%
3
5
Mirage
0%
1
12
Ancient
67%
6
5
Inferno
50%
8
5
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
3
5
Vertigo
27%
11
0
Dust II
36%
11
3
Overpass
67%
12
1
Mirage
20%
5
6
Ancient
50%
2
7
Inferno
61%
18
2
Info
Match analysis of B4 vs Stone by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between B4 and Stone, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by B4. The MVP of this match was Hezz.
B4 analytics
The team B4 secured 15 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for B4 were t9rnay contributed 25 kills and nqz contributed 24 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11622 overall damage.
On the defensive side, B4 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Stone analytics
The team Stone managed to secure 14 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Stone were Hezz contributed 21 kills and kun contributed 22 kills. 10602 of total damage by Stone could not prevent B4 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Stone struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments