0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
166.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
61.125.3
AWP kills on a map
196.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
61.221.6
Trades on a map
11.073.5084
Player score (round)
37581012
Player score (round)
43461012
Player score (round)
38721012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
80%
Inferno
63%
Mirage
50%
Nuke
42%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
33%
Vertigo
23%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
1
3
Mirage
50%
2
1
Nuke
25%
4
0
Dust II
0%
0
4
Ancient
0%
0
1
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
20%
5
11
Inferno
63%
8
1
Mirage
0%
0
20
Nuke
67%
12
0
Dust II
33%
6
6
Ancient
33%
6
4
Vertigo
73%
11
4
Info
Match analysis of AVEZ vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between AVEZ and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by AVEZ. The MVP of this match was gRuChA.
AVEZ analytics
The team AVEZ secured 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AVEZ were gRuChA contributed 26 kills and fanatyk contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10204 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AVEZ held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were stadodo contributed 19 kills and JUST contributed 22 kills. 8916 of total damage by SAW could not prevent AVEZ from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments