0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Inferno
50%
Vertigo
43%
Ancient
40%
Mirage
10%
Anubis
6%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
33%
9
7
Inferno
50%
8
9
Vertigo
57%
14
0
Ancient
40%
10
2
Mirage
60%
5
4
Anubis
44%
9
1
Nuke
0%
0
23
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
1
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
2
Mirage
50%
2
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- lwlww
Info
Match analysis of Aurora Young Blud vs SD Invicta by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Aurora Young Blud and SD Invicta, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by SD Invicta. The MVP of this match was bluewhite.
SD Invicta analytics
The team SD Invicta secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SD Invicta were fierre contributed 13 kills and tooi contributed 14 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7156 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SD Invicta held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Aurora Young Blud analytics
The team Aurora Young Blud managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Aurora Young Blud were bluewhite contributed 20 kills and bl1x1 contributed 14 kills. 6332 of total damage by Aurora Young Blud could not prevent SD Invicta from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Aurora Young Blud struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments