0 Comments
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
67%
Inferno
50%
Vertigo
43%
Ancient
40%
Mirage
10%
Anubis
6%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
33%
9
7
Inferno
50%
8
9
Vertigo
57%
14
0
Ancient
40%
10
2
Mirage
60%
5
4
Anubis
44%
9
1
Nuke
0%
0
23
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
1
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
2
Mirage
50%
2
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- lwlww
Info
Map Analysis of Aurora Young Blud vs SD Invicta by the Bo3.gg Team
SD Invicta on Anubis Analysis
SD Invicta demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for SD Invicta on Anubis were fierre, who contributed 13 kills, and tooi, who added 14 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 7156 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, SD Invicta held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Aurora Young Blud on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Aurora Young Blud, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Aurora Young Blud on Anubis included bluewhite, who contributed 20 kills, and bl1x1, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6332 total damage, Aurora Young Blud couldn't prevent SD Invicta from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, Aurora Young Blud struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments